Assalamu alaikum, it’s nice to see that this discussion is taking place elsewhere and that I’m not alone (not that I didn’t know that already, but I feel pretty alone sometimes). Let me try to clarify where my head is at and what I’m questioning exactly.
Firstly, I’m not considering leaving Islam, just so that’s clear. I put “Islam” in quotes in my original post(s) on this subject because what I was meaning by that was the kind of “Islam” i.e. people’s interpretations of it, that says that violence against non-Muslims, etc., is OK, and if you don’t “tow the line”, if you are too “apologetic” to non-Muslims, then you’re somehow not showing enough “wala wal bara’a” or whatever. Or, let’s just forget about that extreme for a minute, because that definitely seems to be an extreme position.
We tend to have a tendency in our community, and yes it may only be a fraction of us, but we have a tendency nonetheless to get really defensive when things like the Ft. Hood shooting happen, and yes I understand why that is. But whenever something like this happens, you start hearing of how some Muslims are too “apologetic”, or you start seeing the debates as to whether or not Muslims should serve in the military. Now, I don’t know the ruling on Muslims serving in the US military, however, there are thousands? of Muslims currently serving in the military. Maybe they converted after joining the military, perhaps they had their own reasons for joining the military. Let’s not forget that many Muslims may come from economically disadvantaged backgrounds and many times, the military is the only way for people to better themselves economically, although when I’ve brought this up, I was told “the economy is no excuse”. Well, if you’re going to say that, then you should also tell that to the Muslims selling liquor, cigarettes, lottery tickets, and pornographic matterials at the myriad of convenience stores that they happen to own. Because that’s the same reason they use if you ask them why they’re selling haram things like that, “I can’t make money doing anything else” or something like that. But I digress. My point is, you can’t know why said Muslims are serving in the military, and unless you assess every individual Muslim’s situation for yourself, you can’t really make a blanket statement that “Muslims are committing haram” by serving in the military. Now having said that, I don’t necessarily agree, personally, that Muslims should serve in the military, especially given the evangelical Christian bent the military seems to have taken recently, but I’m just not qualified to say definitely one way or the other that it’s absolutely “haram”. See, this is just one example of what happens when people try, with little or know knowledge, to make rulings for themselves and not so much for themselves but to then try to make them binding rulings on everyone else, and what can happen when people attempt to discard 1,000 years or more of Islamic scholarship in order to “get back to the Qur’an and Sunnah”, as if we weren’t following that already! Surely in the 1400 years that Islam, as we know it, has been here, someone has addressed the issue of Muslims serving in a non-Muslim army. And it addressed in today’s context, where there is no “Muslim kaliphate”/ruler, and Muslim countries have been colonized, etc., and many so-called Muslims are Muslim in name only/cultural Muslims only, and not from the time of the crusades or something like that.
I’ve never been a “tow the line” kinda person, I follow what you’d probably call “traditional Islamic scholarship” in that a follow one madhhab pretty much exclusively, and I don’t go around “picking and choosing” rulings unless I have an excuse. Having said that, though, I’m also not the kind of person to go around and say what others are doing is wrong either. I’m just not qualified to do that. But as I’ve said before on this blog, I feel more comfortable following something that has been time-tested, that has some solid methodology behind it, though again, I’ve blogged about this also, so I don’t want to rehash. But basicly, I don’t like the “making rulings for yourself” methodology just simply because I’d not even know where to start with that.
Having said that, though, there are just certain things that are just common sense. So obviously, I don’t need a scholar to tell me to look both ways before I cross the street (or maybe in my case it’s listen), or to lock my doors before I go to sleep. When I talk of “rulings”, I’m speaking of issues that may come up that I may not readily have the answers to like “is it OK for me to get a dog guide”, or “is it permissible to travel alone as a woman and if so how far is the permissible distance” (and the woman shouldn’t travel alone ruling is something that I admittedly have a lot of trouble with, although my understanding is that as long as someone is meeting you at the other end and you’re taking something like a bus, plane, train, etc., then it’s permissible because your safety is guaranteed). Or “can I take my dog guide to the masjid”, or something like that.
Anyway, I’m getting off topic again, hmmm, what was I saying? Oh, yes, that I’m not a “tow the line” kinda person, meaning that I’m not a “follow the community at any cost” kinda person, or a “follow what everyone else is doing” kinda person, or “follow what the imam says” kinda person, and if you read my blog posts on moon sighting, I’m sure you’ll see that. Because at the end of the day, on yaum-al-qiyama, you’re only accountable for yourself and your own deeds. You can’t say “but I followed Shaykh so-and-so” as an excuse. Although now that I’m writing that, the “the leader is responsible for those that follow them”
opinion popped in my head, and you most often see this in relation to moon sighting issues in that “you should follow the leader even if he is wrong, because he’ll be held accountable for the decision, not you”. And then I think, who qualifies as a “leader”? and oops, I’m digressing and rehashing again, but I think I’ve made my point lol.
The thing is, I’ve always been told that “Islam is the middle way”, so I don’t “think so critically” that I take myself out of the bounds of Islam itself, however, I also am not going to be a sheep and just follow someone for the sake of it either.
I also would not describe myself as an “apologist” either. I don’t think I should have to apologize or defend the actions of a so-called Muslim who’s clearly done something beyond the bounds of Islam as I know it and which has been taught to me. However, at the same time, I think there’s a difference between being an “apologist” for and being “defensive” about the actions of so-called “Muslims”, and standing up and condemning something you know is wrong. And to me, perhaps we need to define “apologist” since many want to throw out the word so much. And to me an “apologist” means someone who makes excuses for or tries to justify the behavior of someone or something else. Thus, I’m not an “apologist” because I neither make excuses for or try to justify the behavior of anyone. But if someone is doing something wrong, and I feel the need to, I’ll say something about it. And that’s all that CAIR as well as probably other Muslim groups have done, they’ve come out and condemned the actions of Nidal Hasan in the strongest terms, and I don’t see how that’s being an “apologist”. They are just doing what they need to do, in a climate where anything a Muslim does is going to be used to once again perpetuate the negative stereotype that Muslims are supposedly violent people who have no qualms about killing innocent people “because their religion says so”. And I wish this wasn’t the case, because I obviously don’t feel that one Muslim’s actions even should or just represent the views and opinions of 1.5 or so billion people. However, it is what it is.
It’s kinda like being blind. I don’t think that my actions as a blind person should represent the actions of blind people, however, they often can and do, especially since for many people, I’m probably the only blind person they’ll ever meet or see in their life. So if I’m rude to them when they ask a question, no matter how stupid or ignorant it may seem to me, if I answer them rudely they’ll probably think twice before they approach another blind person again, because they’ll be more likely to think “all blind people are rude”, based on the one interaction they had with me. Yeah, I know it’s not right, and yeah my perceived rudeness could have been because I was upset, not feeling well, having a bad day, etc., But the truth is that for the majority population, it’s stereotypes about the minority that inform many people’s judgments about said minority, especially if they don’t have contact with the “minority” on a normal basis.
So unfortunately, for Muslims living in the West, we’re forced into positions where we have to denounce, explain, condemn, etc., the actions of one Muslim, because of all of the negative stereotypes out there that continue to be perpetuated about Muslims. Even if said actions were from someone who probably had mental issues, even if they were the actions of someone who follows a fringe interpretation of the religion. It’s not right, and we shouldn’t have to do this, but it’s just the way it is at this point.