Assalamu alaikum, there have been 2 recent posts (here and another related one here) on the topic of polygamy and sisters’ distress regarding this issue. And of course, along with kids in the masjid and moon sighting/fighting, polygamy seems to be one more topic that Muslims just can’t resist discussing. And so I’m going to do my best to add my two cents to the maylay.
When reading the comments in reaction to the article, a few things bother me about some of the brothers’ reactions, in particular. The first being the idea that polygamy is a Sunnah and so the sisters should just get over it already. I don’t think that any sister is questioning the “Sunnah-ality” and thus the legitimacy of the practice, but merely how the brothers go about “practicing” said Sunnah, and how they discuss said Sunnah with their other male counterparts. If it’s such a “good” Sunnah, such a high ideal, then maybe the first thing to do would be for brothers to treat it with the maturity and deference that attempting to follow/practice something the Prophet (peace be upon him) himself practiced and approved of deserves. And not the high-school-ish behavior that the author of the original article alludes to. Secondly, I’m once again seeing the “sissters just don’t wanna” theme again. The idea that sisters are just too proud, or too emotional, or too Westernized, to accept something that God has allowed, and whether I see this when talking about abuse in our communities (and again many times sisters’ complaints are couched in terms of how they’re not following the Sunnah enough or how they’re just a bunch of whiners and complainers, among many other things) or when discussing this current topic, again, the blame is placed solely on women. Never mind that perhaps many brothers are desirous of polygamy when they really shouldn’t be, or that perhaps they’re not even treating the one wife they have right, and yet and still they want another one, or two, or three. No, once again, it’s the sisters who have to get a grip, follow what God has ordained, accept the Sunnah, and keep their mouths shut. And another thing that bothered me was how the monogamous nature of the marriage of Khadijah and the Prophet (pbuh) was brushed off in the following statement of “The Prophet (Sallaahu alayhi wa Sallam) prayed towards Masjid al-Aqsa during the early years of prophethood, now are we to follow that particular sunnah as well? Did you ever pause and think that perhaps the verse for taking more than one wife was revealed yet since the Prophet (Sallaahu alayhi wa sallam) was married to Khadeejah during the Makkan period and most of the ahkaam were revealed in the Madinan period.
We have to look at what was the last thing that the Prophet (sallaahu alayhi wa sallam) did and died upon and made it an example for his ummah. If you agree that polygyny is a sunnah why are you discouraging it with your words, albeit indirectly. If the brothers can fulfill the conditions for polygyny and have the need for a second wife, let them be.”
But there in lies the problem… Brothers are practicing polygamy who are *not* fulfilling those conditions, and it’s also mind-boggling to me that those who are against the “have to obey the law of the land” opinion, could even think that an Islamic marriage and a legal marriage are even equal, especially in a place like the US, where a purely religious marriage isn’t recognized? And I love it when the brothers talk about marrying Islamically, and alluding to the fact that a woman/women in said purely Islamic marriage would have their rights upheld? In whose community pray tell, ’cause I’d sure like to know? Anyone who thinks this way, IMHO, and very humble opinion, is really dreaming and not living in reality! I mean, tell that to an Islamically-married woman, who’s being abused, who can’t get an “Islamic divorce” because her abusive husband won’t give it to her. Heck, let’s be honest, most men (and women too) in the community wouldn’t even support her, they’d tell her to stay, make dua, and maybe if she was a good enough of a wife that she’d not be being abused in the first place, and there’s no “Islamic judge” in any community that I’m aware of in the US anyway that would give her a divorce and you think an abusive spouse would relinquish control by voluntarily giving his wife a divorce? You’ve got to be kidding me! And she can’t go to the legal courts because her “marriage” was never legally solemnized. Or, while we’re on the subject, the woman in a polygamous marriage who can’t get health insurance from her husband’s job, either for herself or the kids, or who has no say in matters if he dies (but the legally recognized wife does), and all of the other legal ramifications that can result for a man who has a legally married and an “Islamically” married wife/wives. And all of this “oh they can be against polygamy but be OK with mistresses” stuff, is just an excuse/cover-up! And again IMHO an attempt for many brothers in favor of and actively pushing polygamy, to ignore the realities staring them in the face and who many times are also telling the sisters (and brothers too) who have misgivings not about the practice itself but how it’s being practiced that you’re ignoring a Sunnah, that you’re discouraging it, etc., when all we are merely saying is that there could be problems with the practice if it’s not done correctly and that many times brothers do not handle it in a mature way. Methinks he only way a polygamous marriage in this country could even start to be truly equal would be to have all marriages “islamically married”, i.e., have none of them legally registered, because if one marriage is legal and the rest aren’t, the condition of equality that is required in polygamous unions would not be fulfilled from the get-go, and the fact that some are actively pushing the “one wife legal and the rest not” option is worrying to me, to say the least.
The defensiveness from those pushing polygamy and the accusations of “not being Sunnah enough” or trying to override God’s commandments, etc., when all that is being done is to bring out an issue/problem in the community is truly upsetting and dare I say angering to me. And I love it when people compare apples and oranges (i.e. the Prophet’s marriage to Khadija vs the direction of prayer) to try to defend their position. So are we saying that the Prophet’s marriage to Khadija doesn’t or shouldn’t mean anything because of the time in his life that it occurred, or because it wasn’t what he “died upon”. How very convenient, and I wasn’t aware that this was a fiqhi principle. I had thought that the Prophet’s (pbuh) whole life was supposed to be an example to all mankind, not just the polygamous part of it, or the things he “died upon”, but perhaps I was wrong somewhere. And that is what bothers me that “The Sunnah” for someone is whatever they want it to be, whatever suits their fancy. They can talk about “The Sunnah” of polygamy yet apologize and enable the brother who conveniently forgets the Sunnah of the fact that the Prophet (pbuh) never hit any of his wives. Would people be so quick to brush off the marriage of Khadija if the events were reversed and it took place later on in his life and he “died upon it”? Would brothers be so willing to brush off the polygamous marriages if they weren’t “something that the Prophet died upon”? My guess is probably not, they’d still find some way to argue how polygamy is still the Sunnah, even if it wasn’t something the prophet “died upon”.
Because the truth of the matter is that for many men who either are practicing polygamy or who are desiring to, it ain’t about the Sunnah, although it’s sure a convenient excuse/reason. And we all know the “real” reason many men want a second, third, or fourth wife, and it’s sure not about taking care of widows, orphans or children either. And maybe that’s why many women are so upset about the issue, and it’s not ’cause we’re “Westernized” and have silly notions in our heads that a husband of ours might or should love us and desire us and care for us, or that perhaps, even if the fiqh says he doesn’t, that maybe if he wanted a second wife, that he’d love us and respect us enough to actually tell us and we wouldn’t have to find out through the community grapevine or some other third party that he’d gone and gotten himself a younger, prettier wife. Because while some brothers can go around crowing about how good polygamy is because “those kafirs have mistresses” the way many brothers go about practicing polygamy, they are acting just like the non-Muslims they are so quick to ridicule right down to the secrecy, the creeping, all of it, that it becomes hard to tell the difference as to whether or not they’re getting a second (or fourth) wife or a mistress. Heck, the way they act about it and joke about it, that’s what they might as well be doing. So while brothers can admonish the sisters on “following the Sunnah” etc., brothers could also start by not treating polygamy like it’s some halal way to get their creep on. And then maybe the sisters wouldn’t get so upset about it. Because unlike the brothers who not only have the right to multiple wives but the right to unconditional divorce, and both of those things pretty much whenever they want to, if they so choose, sisters have neither of these options, so brothers really need to be careful how they handle and deal with not only the polygamy issue but the divorce issue as well, which is a whole ‘nother kettle of fish.