Ginny's Thoughts & Things

Thinking Out Loud…

Archive for March, 2008

Clinton ‘misspoke’ over sniper claims

Posted by Ginny on March 30, 2008

Assalamu alaikum, I wanted to blog about this when this first came out, but well, I procrastinated and didn’t get to it. Anyway, you say Hillary “mis-spoke”? Mis-spoke? Are you sure? Uh, wouldn’t a more apt term be “embellished” or “exaggerated”, or perhaps “lied”?

But mis-spoke? No, that doesn’t do what she actually did justice! “Mis-spoke” is when you say the wrong word when you actually meant to say something else, accidentally quote the wrong statistic, perhaps cite the wrong source in a speech, something like that. And what Hillary did was not what I’d call “mis-speaking”.

She deliberately embellished/made up a story, regarding an event that she participated in, in order to pad her foreign policy / experience credentials. Now, if anyone else were to do this, this would severely weaken their campaign if not ruin the campaign outright. But no! Some Hillary supporters/campaign members, as noted earlier, are still saying that Hillary could actually win this thing!

Now, let’s see, what is worse, someone’s pastor saying some controversial (but mostly true, if not admittedly uncomfortable) statements, or the actual candidate outright lying (let’s call it what it actually is OK?) about an event that she participated in? Oh, what would we have done if it weren’t for YouTube?

And this is one of many reasons why I can’t even see myself voting for Hillary in November, not to talk of any primaries. I’m wondering if others see that too, or are they more frightened by a black preacher making controversial statements. Now isn’t that scary, you’ll put up with a lying white candidate, but not a black candidate who’s indirectly linked to statements that, though controversial, are mostly true? Oh, the double standard, if proven to be true, would be shocking but not surprising, to me anyway. It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out, and as the campaign continues on, people need to be reminded of this, among other things, of course.

Posted in America, Controversy, Current Affairs, Hillary Clinton, MSNBC, Media, Politics | Leave a Comment »

Can Hillary Actually Win?

Posted by Ginny on March 30, 2008

Assalamu alaikum / greetings, I was passing through the living/dining room of my house, on the way to take my Leader Dog Chloe out to use the bathroom.  I didn’t stay long once I got
to the door, because I’d not taken her out yet for the day, and I didn’t want any accidents.  Thus, I didn’t hear the whole debate that was playing out
on the TV, nor who all the voices were talking.

All I know was that it was a Sunday talk show of some sort, and that one of the voices was Senator John Kerry.  There were discussing whether or not Hillary
Clinton should get out of the raise.  Someone was saying how she shouldn’t, because she could actually win the popular vote if Michigan and Florida were
redone/if the delegates were reseated, and that there were yet ten states to go yet, and something about the people being allowed to have their voices
be heard.  Kerry mentioned something about how the Clinton Campaign keeps shifting the goal posts, first saying the primaries mattered, then saying they
didn’t, then saying the delegates mattered, then saying it was the popular vote, now saying, well, perhaps the popular vote doesn’t matter, well, unless
she wins it of course.  It’s as though the rules keep changing, or don’t apply to her and her campaign, and could someone tell me how this is different
from what we’ve been seeing since 2000?

 Listen, I ive in Florida, I was not terribly happy that I voted in a primary where my vote, as of now, has not been factored in.  However, I also understand
that the rules are the rules, that Florida knew the rules going in, and knew the consequences of violating those rules should they choose to do so. 

As of now, to my knowledge, both Florida and Michigan have thrown out the idea of do-overs, so there has to be a way that the delegates are seated in a
fair way.  Florida is easy because Barack’s name was actually on the ballot, so you could just seat the delegates proportional to the percentage of Hillary
and Barack’s votes.  The question to me anyway is that of Michigan’s delegates as Hillary was the only one to have left her name on the ballot when that
primary was held.  I’m not sure how those delegates would be divided up, in a fair way.  Is it 50/50?  Would you divide them up based on the national popular
vote percentages? 

Back to the Sunday talk show I referred to earlier.  Is there a way that Hillary could actually win the popular vote?  Why is Florida and Michigan’s popular
votes even being discussed anyway?  I heard the pro-Clinton guy (not sure of his name right now), say something about that if Florida and Michigan were
counted, then Hillary would have won the popular vote, also taking into account supposed upcoming victories.  And according to him, that would just blow
away one of the Obama campaign and his supporters’ arguments as to why Clinton should drop out of the race, namely that he holds the most delegates, currently
the most super-delegates? and the popular vote. 

OK, currently excluding Michigan and Florida, is there any way that Hillary could possibly win?  With the last ten primaries to go, is there any way she
could win and secure the nomination?  With Michigan and Florida factored in, could she win that way?  How would she factor in Michigan, a state where her
opponents’ names weren’t even on the ballot?  How is that fair, putting a state in your column where you’re the only name on the Democratic ballot?  Talk
about “letting the people’s voices be heard”.  What about those people’s voices who didn’t support you?  Do they matter? 

IMHO, we should follow the rules as they’ve been adopted, and then find a fair way to split the delegates of Florida and Michigan and seat them accordingly. 
How that is done, well, I’ll have to leave it up to, well, whoever’s in charge of that sorta thing.
This once again reminds me of what has bothered me about Hillary during this campaign and why I’m not sure, should she end up with the nomination, that I could “hold my nose” and vote for her come November. Firstly, her and her campaign have consistently kept changing the goal posts, saying “little states don’t matter”, then insinuating that Obama was only winning because he was securing the African-American vote, then saying the popular vote didn’t matter, then I even heard someone say that we should use the allotted electoral college delegates to determine the nominee? Huh? And this is not a sequential nor an all-inclusive list, this is just what I can remember from the top of my head.

This isn’t even to talk of her and Bill’s seeming endorsement/campaigning for John McCain, saying that he’s more ready to lead this country than Obama, saying McCain’s more patriotic, etc. And this is hte problem, Hillary’s willingness to throw her own party members under the bus, if it means she looks better in the eyes of the voters, if it means she ultimately wins! And in all of the years that I was at least nominally interested in American politics, I don’t think I’ve ever seen this. Primary opponents generally were at least somewhat civil toward each other, because the winner would eventually need the endorsement and support of their primary opponents during the general election.

And this has happened with the Republicans, even if many Republicans don’t exactly agree with McCain on many issues. Although he’s also pandering to many Conservatives and evangelical Christians as well, imho. But the point is that now that McCain is the presumptive nominee, Republicans are getting behind him! And the question is, will we be able to do this on the Democratic side? Perhaps if Obama is the nominee, but not sure about Hillary. Perhaps even Obama would have a tough time winning over the “Archie Bunker Democrats” as this blog post refers to them.

Posted in America, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, My Life Offline, Politics, Television, Thoughts | 2 Comments »

Can’t Hide Youssou Ndour!

Posted by Ginny on March 29, 2008

…. from anyone! Was watching a video of his recet performance in Atlanta (think it was December?) and Chloe grabbed one of her toys and started excitedly playing with it, and even my fellow housemate came to the door to ask if Chloe was listening to Youssou Ndour again! I said yes, I was watching a video, and it’s funny, because the volume was pretty low, but Youssou’s soaring vocals could still be heard!

Anyway, getting ready for basketball in a little while! And it’s a beautiful day so perhaps I’ll go outside.

Posted in Africa, African Music, Mbalax, Music, Senegal, West Africa, Youssou Ndour | Leave a Comment »

Jericho Really Over?

Posted by Ginny on March 28, 2008

Assalamu alaikum, well, it seems that
Jericho has indeed been cancelled. This is unfortunate as I thought it was a good show, but the season/series finale was so haphazardly thrown together, that if it were my first time watching, I’d wonder why it had not been cancelled sooner.

I guess it got cancelled so fast that they had to throw something together to satisfy the Jericho fans. And although I’m disappointed that it got cancelled, I have to be honest and say that I’m not sure if I’m going to participate in the various campaigns to try to either bring the show back on CBS or to get it picked up by another network.

I’m not sure how far you can take this sort of a show, once you find out who actually set off the bombs, who actually is running the show now, and once all of the comforts of modern life are restored. Where would the hsow go from there? Unless of course you want to go the direction of the finale that they showed on Tuesday and have another American Civil War. Then once you got that finished, what would you do then?

It was and is a good show, but I’m not sure how many seasons you could reasonably take the show without it completely veering away from what originally started the show in the first place? But whatever the case, it’s certainly better than reality TV.

Oh, well, guess I’ll go back to watching Countdown with Keith Olbermann and National Geographic/The Dog Whisperer. (not that I’ve ever stopped watching those shows but, well, that’s just about the only TV I watch anymore). Unles sof ocurse you’re talking about the NCAA men’s basketball tournament going on now. Woo-hoo! And there have been some pretty good games!

Posted in Jericho, Media, Television | 1 Comment »

Very Nice Article!

Posted by Ginny on March 28, 2008

Assalamu alaikum, IzzyMo has written a wonderful article dealing with stereotypes against Muslim women, and how not-so-representative “Muslim” women are pushed out in front, so to speak, and used to represent “Mainstream Muslim women”, or they are used to validate already existing stereotypes of what Muslim women actually are, by saying things that pretty much confirm feminists’ worst fears about “the lives of Muslim women”.

What is sad is that in most cases, the points of view of other, usually more religious, Muslim women are not sought out. It’s usually the secularized, disaffected woman, or the woman who had a “bad experience” with Muslims who is sought out, not hte practicing Muslim woman, the woman who willing strvies to please her Creator, who prays regularly, who wears hijab willingly, etc.

I find that sad, it’s almost like people are just looking for someone who already fulfills their preconceived notions of what a “Muslim woman” actually is, or I should say, someone “from the inside” who can confirm their worst fears for htem. Someone like say, Ayan Hirsi Ali, or Wafa Sultan, or whoever else fits that role. Feminists can find these people who will confirm what they already think they know, and they usually don’t try to get antoher opinion on the matter.

I’m glad to see that they were willing to publish Izzy Mo’s article, and Inshallah, this open’s up people’s eyes, that not all Muslim women are oppressed, etc., etc., etc.

Posted in Islam, Religion, Women | 1 Comment »

Mine for a Year

Posted by Ginny on March 22, 2008

Assalamu alaikum, didn’t realize this was two books in one.

Doug the black Labrador is just a pup when he comes to spend a year with George and his foster family. Afterwards, Doug will become a guide dog for a blind person. Since George has problems with his eyes, it’s possible that he will need a dog guide one day. Mine for a Year is a remarkable true story of a boy and a dog.

My mother read this book to me shortly after I’d gotten Abby. She found it in the “discards”, i.e., books that the library was going to get rid of. When she read it to me, I almost cried, I wondered if Abby had a smiliar life to the puppy Doug, before she went back to Leader Dog for training and I got her.

I wish I could get the book again, well, in an accessible format, and read it again.

Posted in Blindness-related, Books, Disability Issues, Dog Guides, Reading, dogs | Leave a Comment »

The Truth About Trinity United Church of Christ

Posted by Ginny on March 22, 2008

Link found via this blog

Posted in Blogging, Blogs, Politics, Race Issues, Weblogs | 4 Comments »

President Jammeh Claims That His “Demons Are At War”

Posted by Ginny on March 21, 2008

Assalamu alaikum, OK, whether you think this is a deliberate attempt to instill fear in the Gambian people, or you think this man has truly gone mad or is getting their fast, this
is pretty darn scary! And this is supposed to be a head of state? A world leader? What more can you say? And yet the religious leaders continue to say nothing…

Posted in Africa, The Gambia, The Gambia Echo, Thoughts, West Africa | 2 Comments »

What Did He Say?

Posted by Ginny on March 21, 2008

Assalamu alaikum / greetings, when I listened to Obama’s speech on race a couple days ago, a phrase struck me, which I’d wanted to blog about (yeah I know that sounds convenient now), however, sometimes I need time to process things, and at that moment, I was focused on “race”. And so I didn’t mention it then, besides, I just thought I was being a bit oversensitive, as I’m wont to do at times.

But it was his use of the “radical Islam” phrase, I mean, it just hit me like a ton of bricks. I think, perhaps?, though I can’t remember now, he was talking about Israel? I don’t know, and I’d have to go back and read or listen to the speech and truthfully, I just don’t feel like doing that now. Besides, the phrase “radical Islam” just made me forget about everything else surrounding it, and I just thought “oh it’s radical Islam again”, never mind all of the other stuff, the bombing of innocent civilians, the oppression of people, the taking away of their land (oh we can’t talk about that). It’s those darn “radical Muslims” if they’d just go away everything would be fine. I just couldn’t believe he even put that in a speech dealing with America’s racial issues.

Anyway, Umm Zaid said it better than me anyway.

I’m thinking that while Obama is uring us to look our (meaning America’s) race problem squarely in the face and come to terms with it, perhaps he should apply that same strategy to the Palestinians, I mean, it ain’t all because “them there Palestinians” are just a bunch of “radical Moo-slims”. Maybe they have some actual grievances, perhaps the Israelis commit atrocities too (oh shudder the thought). I mean, human rights abuses aren’t just committed by “a-rabs” or “moo-slims” or whoever it is we (meaning the American government) don’t like today. I mean, we knew Saddam was gassing his own people, we knew that the Taliban was oppressing women, and what about the African dictators America was either propping up or assassinating (or at least was aware of other countries’ assassination of African dictators). Reminds me of an HBO movie I saw a few years ago about Patrese Lumumba and the scene where the Belgians are plotting his assassination, and there was this American CIA guy there, and they bleeped out his name (ya know ’cause someone in the government didn’t want his name mentioned, and I gotta see if I can find the article I read that talks about that). But anyway, when I saw that scene, I literally screamed! And started to cry, because right there, for me in living, er, well, right there on TV, was a depiction of the US government’s complicity in the assassination of a duly elected leader of a sovereign nation, who we didn’t like because he called in the Russians to help him with a dispute he was having.

And yet, many want to become upset at what Jeremiah Wright was saying? Well, what, in actuality did he realy say?

Is it really so bad to say that, yes, we love our country, but some really horrible things have been done in our name? And I know why Obama can’t be all pro-Palestinian, and I can understand why he has to distance himself from Jeremiah Wright’s comments right now, but, uh, well, I get the feeling that he’s hatin’ on a fright right now, and he’s doing it for political expediency. I’ve often wondered to myself how the ReverendWright is feeling, to seemingly be thrown under the bus for political expediency?

Perhaps it’s not that bad, however, at least Obama is trying to have it both ways, to distance himself from Wright’s comments, on one hand, but still call him “just like family” at the same time.

This doesn’t take away from Obama’s speech, because IMHO, this was a “conversation” that we as Americans have been needing to have for a long time. However, if we’re going to be honest about one thing, let’s be honest about everything.

Obama, imho, the lesser of evils among the three candidates running for President right now, but as long as he keeps referring to “radical Islam”, every chance he can, it gives me pause when I decide to vote for him. The same for how he talks of the Palestinians, like everything is all their fault and the Israelis are all just sweetness and light.

As I’ve said before, I really like Obama and want to support him, yet these nagging issues with him won’t let me go. And him slipping in that “radical Muslim” phrase just made it worse for me. I wondered what his Muslim family/friends thought of that? I wondered if he embraces his Muslim family members the way he embraces his family members of differing races? And then I thought, “what does he mean by radical Islam/Muslims”?

And I’m going to ramble again, so I think I’ll stop. I’m just writing now. Oh and btw, maybe I’m a radical but when I listened to Reverend Wrights comments in context and in their entirety, I find myself agreeing with many of them. So what exactly was it that Obama *didn’t* agree with? Can someone tell me again?

Posted in America, Barack Obama, Islam, Politics, Race Issues, Thoughts | 2 Comments »

2 fired over Obama passport breach – Decision ‘08- msnbc.com

Posted by Ginny on March 21, 2008

2 fired over Obama passport breach – Decision ‘08- msnbc.com

Assalamu alaikum / greetings, someone seems to have been looking for something… And that’s all I’ll say for now, as this is breaking news.

Posted in America, Barack Obama, MSNBC, NBC, News, Politics | 1 Comment »

Re-watching “The Day After”

Posted by Ginny on March 20, 2008

Assalamu alaikum, I’m sure many of you are asking why on earth I’d do such a thing. I mean, who says “I’m going to go home and watch a movie about nuclear war”? Well, I wanted to re-watch it, to see if it would scare me as much as it did when I was 13 and watched a re-air of it, it was like 1988 or something.

Or rather, I should actually say “listen” to it, because at the time, I listened to it via my radio which could pick up the local ABC aphiliate. Now, the second time they re-aired the movie, they didn’t have months of promotion, they didn’t have the hotline counsellors standing by that people could call, and they didn’t have the “no commercial break after the nuclear attack”, nor the post-show discussion, as they did for the original airing in 1983. (Which btw, I don’t even remember, I’d have been 8 at the time, and probably in bed when the show came on, and I don’t remember anyone at school having watched it, nor any teachers sending us home to watch it as some schools did).

Anyway, I re-watched it, as I’m now in the middle of my second (and perhaps final) season of Jericho, and according to Jericho’s producers, the concept of the show was framed around a The Day After/Threads/Testament scenario, but they wanted to take things further, to explor the characters in a more in-depth way, to get past the “apocolypse” of it all.

I need to find a good spoiler/recap of “The Day After” so that I can pick up on the visual stuff that I’m sure I’ve missed. However, The Day After left me with an odd sense of hope, that if God forbid something like this were to happen, perhaps some of us, with proper shelter and supplies, could perhaps survive a nuclear attack. Maybe I’m just being optimistic, and yes, I think nuclear war, and really any kind of war, is a real danger! I mean, I don’t need to tell you we’re living in crazy times.

Anyway, another reason why I watched the movie again was to see how I reacted to the movie as a Muslim, would my feelings, thoughts, or reactions be affected differently? What I mean to say is, when I watch a movie, I try to imagine myself in the shoes of the characters, much like I do when I’m listening to a book, and I think to myself, “if it were me, what would I do”?

Of course, in the case of The Day After, the answer would have been to have found some peaceful solution and not to have even set off the bombs in the first place. However, in sticking to the plot of the movie, I’d think to myself “what would I do”? Would I set up a shelter? What would I stock it with? How would I make accommodations for things like prayer, making wudu/ghusl, etc.? In addition to the other survival skills needed to survive something like this?

Which brings me to another question. In the US, “survivalist” groups are associated mostly, to my knowledge anyway, with right-wing, in some cases evangelical Christian groups. Are their groups of Muslims who plan for catastrophic events such as war, famine, disasters, etc.? Am I silly/crazy for even thinking like htis?

Many years ago, I used to listen to the Art Bell show, as I was a night owl (still am, but I have to work during the day). and he always advertised what I’d call “survival products”, i.e., radios, a 2-year supply of food and water, etc., and he’d state why we’d need to have something like this.

I think even the federal government states that one should keep emergency stocks of food, water, and supplies just in case we have some sort of a disaster. So perhaps I’m not crazy after all. But maybe you guys should reconsider if you see me constructing a fall-out shelter in my backyard (lol).

OK, back to March Madness! Will try to blog about that later Inshallah! I gotta lighten things up around here somehow!

Posted in Nuclear War, Thoughts | Leave a Comment »

Race Is Still a Painful Issue

Posted by Ginny on March 20, 2008

… and I know I’ve said this a hundred times…

Assalamu alaikum/ greetings, I’m still pondering the Obama speech given yesterday on race, and also pondering the Sean Hannity / Newt Gingrich reaction/pontification that I caught on the way home yesterday.

In short, regarding Obama’s speech, it was well-delivered, forthright, honest, and concise, and I think said what needed to be said.

What I’ve been mulling over, though, is comments I heard on the Sean Hannity show. I normally try not to let myself get angry over such things, however, my emotions got the better of me, and I could feel the muscles in my face changing, I could feel the color rising to my cheeks, and I knew at that moment I’d lost the battle. I’d wished at that moment that I could be like my husband and remain laid back about the situation, to just “listen to see what the other side is saying”. To be able to say to myself that these talk-show people are just making a career out of playing on people’s worst hatred and fears, and using those fears and hatred to divide people. However, I can’t do that, because what people say, in many cases, affects me profoundly.

I’ll sum up the Hannity / Gingrich exchange in a few words, they admitted the speech was a good one, but as Gingrich put it, “he gave a good speech about the wrong topic”, and then proceeded to say something about how Obama didn’t say enough, how there was still certain things Obama didn’t address, that “how could Obama know this man for twenty years and not hear or know of him saying these sorts of derogatory things”, etc. I’m not sure what the rest of the conversation was about as I’d arrived at home by that time, and was happy to not have to listen to that anymore.

What struck me, though, was a few things. Gingrich and Hannity kept talking about “hate”, again driving home the “racism” and lack of patriotism of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, yet not mentioning Conservative pastors who made statements after 9/11 that the terror attacks on that day were vengence against America for homosexuality, abortion, and a whole host of other things.

Not only this, and I know this has nothing to do with race, however, shortly after 9/11 Hannity had the Reverend Jerry Vines? on his show talking about how the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), was a child molester (wa aoodhu billah), and all of the other lies that we all are aware of regarding the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace). And when he was saying all of this him and Hannity went on and on about how “we need to get this information out to people so they know what we’re up against”.

I’ll never forget that. I’ll never forget how sick I felt, how I literally almost threw up, how sad, upset, and angry I felt. This added to the sense of fear and foreboding I felt after 9/11, how I was afraid to go outside of my home because of the fear of being attacked. How some of my friends at that time (non-Muslim) stopped speaking to me. How someone who was a friend of a frend said “go back to where you came from”, and the friend stayed silent.

So when Sean Hannity talks about how he is not a racist, how he doesn’t hate, I just don’t, I just can’t, believe him. And when he talks about “Obama not saying enough” I just say to myself that this man is a hypocrite! Pure and simple!

I wish I could put into words all of the things I still want to say. how sometimes I feel like I don’t fit in anywhere, how hard it is to say “yeah white people have done this”, and not sound like a guilty white person for saying it. Because I’ve been thinking a lot about my previous posts, and methinks they are a bit harsh. I feel badly for saying them.

Because maybe they are true, but I don’t like voicing those sorts of thoughts, because I feel like no matter what, if you’re white, you can’t be in the middle, you can’t say “yes we’ve done a lot of htings”, because then you seem guilty, but if you don’t admit to certain things, like that racism still exists, for example, then you seem like a racist.

There really is no middle ground I don’t think. And as I’ve said, I went through that “white guilt” stuff before, and perhaps sometimes I still go thorugh it to some degree, however, at some point, you have to find a happy medium between recognizing the truth and not feeling responsible for something you had nothing to do with. And in so doing, find a way to correct the wrongs of the past by Inshallah, making sure they don’t happen again.

To take it back to the original topic at hand, I think that was what Obama was trying to do yesterday. To put the truth out there in a non-threatening way, to make people aware of it who might not otherwise would be, and then give us a way to move forward from there.

For many of us, whether black or white, or whatever, race has been and continues to be a very painful experience / topic, and it’s a very nuanced thing. And I just think there’s a lot of ignorance out there on all sides, of communities that people don’t come into contact with, except on TV and in movies, etc.

And it’s the same with blind people, there’s a lot of ignorance about the disabled, why should I think it would be any different that in an all-white or all-black community, there’d be a lot of ignorance about “the other”, just because you don’t try to get to know anything about “the other”.

And on that note, I’ll stop rambling as I need to get to bed.

Posted in America, Barack Obama, Politics, Race Issues, Thoughts | 6 Comments »

Oh Boy, This Might Be Bad…

Posted by Ginny on March 16, 2008

Assalamu alaikum/greetings… I’m referring to the video that’s been showing, well, at least it was Friday Night of Obama’s former? pastor Jeremiah Wright saying things like “G*d D*mn America”, how Obama knows what it’s like to be a black man, and other things. I thought about linking to the comments, however, I’m sure if you want to find this on YouTube or some other blog it’s probably there.

When I heard the comments, my first thought was “ya know, I understand why Rev. Wright is saying this”, although I didn’t like the profanity (in a church? no less). Then my second thought was that this isn’t going to be a good thing, as Obama is trying to campaign on the fact that he can bring many different kinds of people together. Even if Obama doesn’t agree with what Rev Wright has said, how can you say that you can bring so many different kinds of people, including a substantial number of white voaters, together when you have a close friend/advisor of yours who has a history of saying things that could upset a good portion of the people you’re trying to get to vote for you?

A good portion of white middle America, for example, isn’t going to like hearing “g*d d*mn America”, and all of the “white people/Americans are evil” talk, and I’m not debating the truthfulness or lack thereof of the statements. I’m just saying, they’re not going to like to hear that kind of rhetoric. They’d rather listen to, and probably agree with, Geraldine Ferraro, whose comments were not quite as explicit as Rev. Wright’s comments, and thus, are easier to explain away, and also, unfortunately, probably have a wider appeal among likely (white) voters. Sad fact, but that’s just the way it is. As they say, racism is still alive and well, even if in most cases it only manifests itself secretly, like in the privacy of the voting booth.

I saw Barack’s response on Countdown with Keith Olbermann, and I just didn’t think it was sufficient enough, yeah he might have known about this a year ago, but some would say, why didn’t he do something about it then? He kinda sorta distanced himself from Rev. Wright but wasn’t Rev. Wright still on his campaign or something? At least before he left the campaign once his comments, on video anyway, became public.

I also find it hard to believe that Obama had never heard Rev. Wright make these sort of statements before, as Obama seems to be a fairly regular churchgoer, or that he wasn’t aware of these statements being made. And even if he knew about them, what could he have done? He says he would have done something, but what would that have been? It just seems strange to me that Obama was not aware of these kinds of statements until a year ago!

I have to be honest and say my first impulse was to try to defend Obama and Rev. Wright, because Mr. Wright said many things that I could at least find myself sympathizing with Mr. Wright on. However, I’m not the average white voter either.

And I also can’t in good conscience disagree with Geraldine Ferraro’s comments, and at the same time defend the Rev. Wright’s comments. Because for me, you can debate the “truth” of the comments, however, I’m not sure they, especially with the profanity, were appropriate for a Sunday morning service, and especially being made *while* Obama was campaigning.

And though I may have many issues with my government, saying “G*d d*mn America” and “Amerikkka” etc., is just beyond the pale. Because that implies that all of America, and in particular, all of white America, are part of the “evils” that the Rev. Wright was talking about in his sermons. And that offends me.

I can and do as a white person, speak openly about the wrongs that other white people have done, but I don’t want to be held responsible for those wrongs, or branded as guilty for committing those same wrongs, just because I’m the same color as the people who, for example, have lynched people, have enslaved people, or who hold racist and prejudiced views today. Yes, navigating “white privilege” and speaking out against the wrongs of white people can be really tricky, but that’s another post for another day. But anyway… I also can’t in good conscience say it’s OK to associate Ferraro’s comments with Hillary Clinton, while at the same time, want to separate Reverend Wright’s comments from Obama, because that would be hypocritical. If I want to say that Rev. Wright’s comments shouldn’t reflect negatively against Obama, then, I can’t then turn around and say that Geraldine Ferraro’s comments should at the same time, as it turns out, reflect badly on Hillary.

All of this could unfortunately leave a lot of questions in voters’ minds, i.e., either Obama is supposedly a Muslim, or if he’s not, he goes to a racist church, and thus he doesn’t really want to represent “me” (meaning white voter), and so they vote for Hillary. Because even though Hillary may be many things, and they may not much like Hillary, I think people have the sense that at least they know what they’re getting from her, even if it means she stabs them in the back after she’s elected.

At least as a white candidate, who’s “racist in the right way”, meaning against minorities, they feel safe with her. Obama? No, because there’s too many unknowns as voiced in a previous post by mr. “Ohio voter”, “he might be a Muslim”, “he doesn’t have the experience” “oh and he’s racist”, and in the “wrong” sorta way, meaning, against white people. So in short, there’s just too many “unknowns” and the kinds of unknowns that would scare off most “white” Americans, or at least those who perceive themselves to be “white” or “Middle-class” or anything not minority.

It’s sad, but that’s just the way things are. And I’m not sure if all the “hope and change”rhetoric can overcome this, and even if Obama gets the nomination, Fox News, Sean Hannity, and yes perhaps even Hillary, among others, will be right there throwing the Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s comments right back in Obama’s face.

Posted in America, Barack Obama, Controversy, Hillary Clinton, Politics, Thoughts | Leave a Comment »

Tornado slams downtown Atlanta – CNN.com

Posted by Ginny on March 15, 2008

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Witness: Block after block of debris – CNN.com

Posted by Ginny on March 15, 2008

Witness: Block after block of debris – CNN.com

ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) — I always said if I ever was in a tornado, I’d come up with something better to say than it sounded like a freight train. I lied.

The tornado caused extensive damage to CNN Center and other downtown buildings.

Inshallah, everyone is OK, though I heard there were injuries!

Posted in America, Current Affairs, News, Weather | Leave a Comment »

Don’t Wanna Do It Anymore

Posted by Ginny on March 12, 2008

Assalamu alaikum, I received a comment that made me just, well, speechless! There was a part of me that wanted to argue, and then I just thought to myself, “What is the point?”

My understanding of Islam seems to be very different than theirs (and it’s not just about music either, and I never said music was OK, in fact, I said I was struggling with it). The Suhaib Webb post I referred to above, but didn’t link to at the time, gave what I thought was a balanced approach to it since, contrary to what some say, the issue of music has been a very controversial one. And I by no means think that music is entirely allowed, in fact, the best I could say is that the vast majority of it shouldn’t be listened to! However, for many Muslims this is a struggle, and even if it’s not, perhaps the best thing to do with a controversial issue like this, especially if you are someone like me who has virtually no knowledge, is to just let it go!

There are many points in the comment that I either am not sure about or don’t agree with. Like just pulling out ahadith and making rulings on them, the issue of the “73 sects”, just to name two. And this is not to even talk of the harshness, the “oh I’m sorry I said that, but let me just go on and bash you some more, tell you how you’re wrong and then proceed to command that you must come to the haqq or to the Hell-Fire you’ll go”. However, I don’t have the time or the energy to refute this sort of comment.

Whether you’re doing something during this month to commemorate the birth of the Prophet (peace be upon him) or not, perhaps one of the best ways to remember him would be to watch how we talk to each other as Muslims, to understand what it means to “enjoin the good and forbid the wrong”, and when we are trying to correct someone, to do it with compassiona nd understanding of the other person’s feelings and struggles!

Which is why I won’t get into a comment war with “Talha Yasin”, because it’s not worth it. I don’t agree with the tone of the comment, but I will assume that the person’s intentions are good, that the person meant well, even if I found some aspects of the comment to be harsh and offensive.

Posted in Islam, Music, Thoughts | 1 Comment »

Need Some Help?

Posted by Ginny on March 11, 2008

Assalamu alaikum / greetings, I want to display my recent posts as well as recent comments, and I can’t do it. I think it’s a drag and drop thingy that you gotta do, however, the drag and drop commands for Jaws aren’t doing the job. Could someone help?

I know that I’ve been doing a lot of political blogging, and I’d like to do some more mawlid blogging, and take Umm Zaid up on blogging about our Beloved Messenger (peace be upon him). However, I can’t put into words what I want to say. Especially when you seem to be in a “mawlid-free zone”. Meaning that those around you don’t seem to put much stock in celebrating the birth of our Prophet (peace be upon him), or worse, see it as a bida and chastise those who do choose to do something to commemorate those most momentous of occasions.

However, just to keep things positive, those does not stop me or anyone else from doing something to celebrate the birth of hte Prophet, either by reading more Qur’an, reciting more Dhikr, or perhaps writing a post (or a series of them), dealing with how Islam and th emessage of Islam has affected our lives. Just some thoguths and ieas.

I’ve not been feeling well, and I have the rest of a busy week ahead, and Inshallah, I’ll do some more blogging on this subject once the weekend gets here. The thing is, for some reason, I don’t do very well on what I like to call “spiritual posts”. I feel like they seem stale, not original, there isn’t the beauty to them that I find with other people’s posts. And that makes me sad.

To think that I can expend all the energy that I have on political blogging, yet not find time to write about our Beloved Messenger (peace be upon him), or that I have the time but can’t put into words what it is I exactly want to say.

I wonder if it would make any difference if my local masjid had a whole series of events this month, or if there were events close to where I am, if that would spur me to writing. Or give me words or motivation to put something down, I’d say on paper, but, uh, what is the alternative term? Well, something that would give me motivation to put something up on this blog.

Inshallah, something will come to me. The most recent comment on my “thoughts on music” post really got me down! Because listening to music is a real struggle for some of us Muslims and the tone of the comment was a bit harsh, it smacked of “we’re right and you’re wrong and you’re going to go to Hell if you don’t change”, etc., etc., etc. I seem to have read a more nuanced, more understanding, treatment of the “music issue” on Suhaib Webb’s blog, and that seems to be a fairer, less harsher, and more merciful way of dealing with the issue.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Geraldine Ferarro Plays the Race Card « From the Left

Posted by Ginny on March 11, 2008

Assalamu alaikum / greetings, another “wonderful” comment from the Hillary Clinton camp.

And this illustrates another reason why I will not vote for this woman! Ever! First, Bill Clinton makes a comment about Obama’s win in South Carolina, basically that it really doesn’t matter, ’cause Jesse Jackson won there in both 1984 and 1988, insinuating that he only won there because he was black. Then, by Hillary talking about “taking Obama at his word” that he wasn’t a Muslim, and now this? Now the comment about Obama not being a Muslim, many media pundits have suggested that Hillary might use the “Obama might be a Muslim” issue to plant doubt in the minds of voters. To be fair, though, the comment made on the 60 minutes show seems pretty tame to me, she pretty much says, she doesn’t think he’s a Muslim, though perhaps to some, she’s trying to leave the door open to use that for future ammunition, while at the same time not appearing to do so. And based on what we’ve seen so far, it seems that the Hillary camp will stoop to any level, will stop at nothing to win.

The comments on the above-linked post also link to some pretty interesting posts in their own right.

Posted in America, Barack Obama, Blogging, Blogs, Controversy, Current Affairs, Hillary Clinton, News, Politics, Race Issues, Racism, Thoughts | Leave a Comment »

Girl in Clinton ad supports Obama – Yahoo! News

Posted by Ginny on March 9, 2008

Girl in Clinton ad supports Obama – Yahoo! News

Assalamu alaikum / greetings, now how ironic is that?

Posted in America, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Political Ads, Politics | Leave a Comment »

Fla. mail-in primary plan gains traction – Yahoo! News

Posted by Ginny on March 9, 2008

Posted in America, Barack Obama, Current Affairs, Hillary Clinton, News, Politics | Leave a Comment »